Connect your exchanges, wallets, and ERP

CryptaCount pulls activity from your exchanges, wallets, and blockchains, does the accounting, and pushes reconciled journals into the ERP you run. No CSV gymnastics, no manual re-keying — crypto data flows into your books as clean double-entry.

The integration problem

Crypto data lives everywhere — multiple exchanges, dozens of wallets, several chains — and none of it speaks accounting. Exporting CSVs and stitching them together by hand is where errors enter and audit trails break. The fix isn't more exports; it's a sub-ledger that ingests every source automatically and reconciles them into one set of books.

Exchange integrations

Connect your exchange accounts by API and CryptaCount imports trades, transfers, fees, and income at transaction level — then classifies and posts them. Major venues including Binance, Coinbase, and Kraken are supported, with structured CSV import for anything not yet natively connected.

Wallet & on-chain coverage

Add a wallet address and CryptaCount reads its on-chain history directly. Because chain data comes through our own on-chain data infrastructure rather than a third-party API, internal transfers, gas, and DeFi activity across 90+ chains are captured more completely — and traced back to source for audit. The crypto sub-ledger → · DeFi accounting →

ERP & general-ledger sync

This is the difference between a data tool and an accounting platform: CryptaCount doesn't dump raw rows into your GL, it posts reconciled journals mapped to your chart of accounts.

• [Xero](/en/crypto-exchange-integrations/xero/) — live. Reconciled journals post directly today.
• Zoho Books — live. Direct posting available today.
• [QuickBooks](/en/crypto-exchange-integrations/quickbooks/) — coming soon. Export journal entries for import today; direct connector on the roadmap.
• [NetSuite](/en/crypto-exchange-integrations/netsuite/) — coming soon. Export today; direct connector on the roadmap.
• [Sage](/en/crypto-exchange-integrations/sage/) — coming soon. Export today; direct connector on the roadmap.

Your existing accounting system stays the system of record. CryptaCount handles the crypto sub-ledger and feeds it clean.

How sync works

1. Connect exchanges (API), wallets (address), and your ERP.
2. Ingest & classify every transaction at source.
3. Reconcile on-chain ↔ exchange ↔ GL so nothing is missing or double-counted.
4. Post summarised, balanced journals into your accounting system, mapped to your chart of accounts.

Crypto reconciliation →

Don't see your platform?

If an exchange or wallet isn't natively supported yet, CryptaCount accepts structured imports so coverage isn't a blocker. Talk to us →

Why CryptaCount

• Native chain data. On-chain activity read from our own infrastructure, not rented — fewer gaps, better DeFi and internal-transfer coverage.
• Reconciled, not raw. Journals are posted after reconciliation and mapped to your CoA, so the ERP receives clean accounting, not a data dump.
• Built for groups. Many wallets and entities, one consolidated set of books. Multi-wallet & multi-entity →

The full picture: three connection types, one set of books

Integrations for crypto accounting are not one problem but three, and a platform that treats them as one will leak data at the seams. The first connection type is exchanges, reached by API, where trades, transfers, fees and income arrive at transaction level. The second is wallets and chains, reached by address, where on-chain history — including internal transfers, gas and DeFi — is read directly. The third is the ERP or general ledger, where reconciled journals are posted back into the system that produces your statements. CryptaCount sits in the middle of all three, ingesting from the first two, doing the accounting, and feeding the third. The whole point is that crypto data flows into your books as clean double-entry rather than as a pile of CSVs you stitch together by hand.

The reason this matters is that every manual export is a place where errors enter and audit trails break. Stitching CSVs together loses cost basis on transfers, mislabels self-transfers as sales, and produces numbers no one can trace. Replacing exports with live ingestion is what keeps the books complete — and it is also what lets the sub-ledger reconcile three sources against each other, which a hand-built spreadsheet can never do reliably.

How the connectors fit together

On the exchange side, major venues including Binance →, Coinbase → and Kraken → connect by API, with structured CSV import for anything not yet natively connected so coverage is never a hard blocker. On the chain side, wallet history is read directly across 90+ blockchains through our own on-chain data infrastructure, which captures internal transfers, gas and DeFi more completely than a third-party API. On the ERP side, the connectors post reconciled journals mapped to your chart of accounts: Xero → and Zoho Books are live today, while QuickBooks →, NetSuite → and Sage → are on the roadmap, with journal export available in the meantime.

The dividing line that makes this an accounting platform rather than a data tool is what reaches your GL. CryptaCount does not dump raw rows into the ledger; it posts summarised, balanced journals after reconciliation, mapped to the accounts you nominate. Your existing accounting system stays the system of record — the sub-ledger simply feeds it clean.

Who needs this kind of integration layer

• Finance teams drowning in exchange and wallet CSVs that never reconcile cleanly to the GL
• Accounting firms onboarding clients whose data lives across many venues and chains
• Treasuries and funds that need transaction-level import, not month-end summaries that hide detail
• Multi-entity groups mapping many wallets and entities into one consolidated chart of accounts
• Teams already standardised on Xero or Zoho Books who want crypto to post like every other sub-ledger

The sync workflow, step by step

The flow is the same regardless of how many sources you connect. First, connect exchanges by API, wallets by address, and your ERP. Second, ingest and classify every transaction at source, so nothing depends on a manual label. Third, reconcile on-chain against exchange against GL, so nothing is missing or double-counted. Fourth, post summarised, balanced journals into your accounting system, mapped to your chart of accounts. Each posted line keeps a path back to the underlying transactions, so a reviewer at the ERP end is checking a handful of journal lines per account rather than wading through thousands of raw rows — and can open the full detail behind any of them on demand. The sub-ledger is where that reconciliation happens before anything reaches your books.

Why reconciled journals beat a raw data dump

It is worth dwelling on the single design choice that separates CryptaCount from the long tail of crypto data tools, because it is the choice that determines whether your GL stays usable. A data tool exports rows; an accounting platform posts entries. A single active trading week can produce thousands of on-chain and exchange events, and pushing each one into your general ledger would bloat the ledger, slow every report and bury the handful of figures the financial statements actually need — without adding any accounting value, because the GL only needs the net effect on each account. CryptaCount instead aggregates each accounting period into summarised, balanced journals that move digital assets, realised gain/loss, income and fees by their net amounts, and maps them to the accounts you nominate. The full transaction detail stays in the sub-ledger where it can be reconciled and audited, and every posted line drills straight back to it. You get a tidy ledger and a complete record at once, rather than having to choose between them — which is exactly the trade-off a raw CSV import forces on you.

A buyer's guide: what to check in a crypto integration

• API plus CSV — automatic import for connected sources and structured CSV for everything else, so coverage is never a wall
• Native chain data, not rented — own infrastructure captures DeFi and internal transfers that third-party APIs miss
• Reconciled journals, not raw rows — the GL should receive clean accounting after reconciliation, mapped to your CoA
• Two-way ERP sync where it exists — pulling your chart of accounts in to drive mapping beats guessing at account names
• Multi-wallet, multi-entity — many sources should consolidate into one set of books without a second spreadsheet
• A graceful fallback — when a venue isn't natively connected yet, structured import should keep it from blocking close

Common pitfalls this design avoids

• CSV gymnastics at close — manual exports stitched by hand are where errors enter and audit trails break
• Raw transactions dumped into the GL — bloats the ledger and makes reports unusable; summaries belong there instead
• Lost basis on transfers in — assets moved from another venue with no basis distort every later gain
• Self-transfers booked as sales — moving funds between your own wallets should never create a phantom gain
• Incomplete DeFi from rented APIs — third-party data sources miss internal transfers and contract activity that native infrastructure captures
• Re-keying between systems — every manual hop between exchange, wallet and ERP is a place for a number to change

How CryptaCount delivers this

CryptaCount reads on-chain activity from our own infrastructure rather than renting it, so there are fewer gaps and better DeFi and internal-transfer coverage. It reconciles before it posts, so your ERP receives clean accounting mapped to your chart of accounts rather than a data dump. And it is built for groups, consolidating many wallets and entities into one set of books. Xero and Zoho Books post reconciled journals directly today; QuickBooks, NetSuite and Sage can consume exported journal entries now and gain direct connectors on the roadmap. If a platform isn't natively supported yet, structured import keeps it from being a blocker. See how the engine behind the postings works on the crypto sub-ledger → page and explore crypto accounting by asset →.

Do you push raw transactions or accounting entries into our GL?

Accounting entries. CryptaCount reconciles first, then posts summarised double-entry journals mapped to your chart of accounts — not raw transaction rows. That is the difference between an accounting platform and a data tool, and it is what keeps your ledger readable.

What if our exchange or wallet isn't natively supported yet?

Structured CSV import covers anything without a native connector, so coverage is never a hard blocker. Major venues like Binance, Coinbase and Kraken connect by API, and on-chain wallets are read by address across 90+ chains; everything else flows in through structured import.

Is on-chain data really more complete than a third-party API?

Because chain history is read through CryptaCount's own infrastructure rather than a rented API, internal transfers, gas and DeFi activity are captured more completely and traced back to source. Third-party APIs commonly miss exactly those events, which is where reconciliation gaps and unexplained balances come from.

Which ERPs can receive reconciled journals today?

Xero → and Zoho Books are live, posting reconciled journals mapped to your chart of accounts directly. QuickBooks →, NetSuite → and Sage → are on the roadmap; in the meantime you can export journal entries and import them, with the direct connectors automating the posting step when they ship.

Does connecting our ERP disturb existing bank feeds or invoicing?

No. The connectors only add crypto journals to your ledger. Your bank feeds, invoices, bills and reconciliations continue exactly as before, with the crypto entries posted alongside them to the accounts you choose. The ERP remains the system of record throughout.

Can we map crypto activity to our own chart of accounts?

Yes — entirely. You decide where each kind of activity lands: digital asset holdings to asset accounts, disposals to realised gain/loss, staking and reward income to a revenue or other-income account, and network and exchange fees to expense accounts. Mapping is set once and reused every period, so the postings match the account structure your auditors and stakeholders already expect rather than forcing your books to fit the tool. Where a connector is two-way, it imports your chart of accounts to drive that mapping directly.

How does the reconciliation prevent double-counting across sources?

CryptaCount ties on-chain activity to exchange records and to the GL before anything posts, so a transfer that appears in two sources is recognised once, and a movement between your own wallets nets to zero instead of creating a phantom disposal. Reconciling the three sources against each other is precisely what a hand-built spreadsheet cannot do reliably, and it is what evidences that the books are complete rather than merely plausible.